Case File · NASA · Cold War / Blue Book Era (1953-1969) Declassified June 12, 2026 · PURSUE Release 03

Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part I, June 9, 1965 — NASA File

UFO Astronaut Sighting

This document is a preliminary transcript (Part I) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Astronaut Ed White recounts seeing “sparkles” during the flight.

June 9, 1965
North Atlantic Ocean
Document titled "GT-4 FLIGHT CREW DEBRIEFING TRANSCRIPT PART I".
Document titled "GT-4 FLIGHT CREW DEBRIEFING TRANSCRIPT PART I". · Source: declassified document

Incident Overview

On June 9, 1965, in North Atlantic Ocean, NASA preserved a documentary record that was declassified and published on June 12, 2026 as part of the third tranche of the Department of War’s Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters (PURSUE).

What the government released

This document is a preliminary transcript (Part I) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Astronaut Ed White recounts seeing “sparkles” during the flight.

Primary-source excerpt

Drawn directly from the released document: “Downgrade at 3 year intervals Declassified after 12 years NOTICE: This document may be exempt from public disclosure under the Freedom of lnfor• rnation Act (5 U S C. Requests for Its ra• lec1 e to persons outside the U. Government should be handled under the provisions of NASA Polley Cir ecti11e 1382 2, I COI JFIDENTIAt PREFACE This preliminary transcript was made from voice tape recordings of the GT 4 flight crew debriefing conducted aboard the recovery ship, the USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Although all the material contained in this transcript has been edited, the urgent need for the preliminary transcript by mission”.

Status of the case

Records released under the PURSUE program are designated unresolved by the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, which means the federal government has not concluded the events were anomalous, has not concluded they were conventional, and has not ruled out either possibility. Where AARO has offered a likely source for an item — an infrared sensor aboard a military aircraft, a commercial camera, or a known optical effect — that attribution is the agency’s working assessment rather than a final determination. Conventional candidates such as drones, balloons, flares, satellites, parallax and forced-perspective artifacts, and ordinary aircraft remain on the table for any unresolved case absent better data than a single sensor pass or a witness recollection.

Sources