Thylacine (Tasmanian Tiger) Sightings

Cryptid

The last known Tasmanian Tiger died alone in Hobart Zoo on September 7, 1936. Yet every year, dozens report seeing them—striped, dog-like creatures slipping through the Tasmanian wilderness. Scientists are now working to bring them back.

1936 - Present
Tasmania, Australia
5000+ witnesses

Thylacine (Tasmanian Tiger) Sightings

On September 7, 1936, in a concrete enclosure at Hobart Zoo, the last known Tasmanian Tiger died alone. The animal had been locked out of its shelter during an unusually cold night—an act of negligence that ended not just a life but a species. The thylacine, or Tasmanian Tiger, had survived millions of years. It had outlived the dingoes that drove it from the Australian mainland. It had survived predation, disease, and competition. What it could not survive was us. European settlers hunted it relentlessly, blaming it for sheep deaths, collecting government bounties on its striped hide. By 1936, it was gone. Or was it? In the decades since that September night, thousands of people have reported seeing thylacines—striped, dog-like animals with a distinctive stiff-legged gait, crossing roads at dawn, slipping into the bush. Most scientists believe the species is extinct. But Tasmania’s wilderness is vast, much of it unexplored, and hope persists that somewhere in the remote highlands, the Tasmanian Tiger still hunts. And if it doesn’t—science may soon bring it back.

The Animal

The thylacine was one of evolution’s most remarkable creatures:

According to documented history, the thylacine occupied a unique place in the natural world:

Classification: Despite its common names (Tasmanian Tiger, Tasmanian Wolf), the thylacine was neither feline nor canine—it was a marsupial. Females carried their young in a backward-facing pouch, like kangaroos. Yet its body evolved to resemble a dog so closely that it represents one of the most striking examples of convergent evolution known to science.

Appearance: The thylacine possessed a body length of approximately 3.5-4 feet, plus a rigid tail of about 2 feet in length. Its weight ranged from 40 to 70 pounds. The animal’s coat was sandy brown to grayish, adorned with 15-20 distinctive dark brown stripes across the back and rump. It had large, powerful jaws capable of opening remarkably wide—up to 80 degrees, wider than any other mammal. Furthermore, it possessed a stiff, kangaroo-like tail and a distinctive stiff-legged gait, different from dogs or wolves.

Behavior: The thylacine was a carnivorous animal, hunting smaller animals including wallabies, possums, and birds. It was generally solitary and nocturnal. Remarkably, the thylacine was capable of standing on its hind legs with tail support, like a kangaroo. It was also shy and not naturally aggressive toward humans.

Range: Originally, the thylacine lived throughout Australia, Tasmania, and New Guinea. It disappeared from the mainland approximately 3,000-4,000 years ago—around the time the dingo was introduced. By European contact, it survived only in Tasmania.

The Extinction

The thylacine’s destruction was swift and deliberate:

European settlement: When Europeans colonized Tasmania in the early 1800s, they brought sheep. The thylacine was blamed for livestock deaths (often unfairly—wild dogs and poor husbandry caused many losses). Settlers saw the thylacine as vermin to be exterminated.

The bounty system: In 1888, the Tasmanian government introduced bounty payments for thylacine carcasses. These payments were set at £1 per adult and 10 shillings per juvenile. Between 1888 and 1909, bounties were paid on 2,184 thylacines. Many more were killed for which no bounties were claimed.

Additional pressures: Habitat destruction occurred as land was cleared for agriculture. Disease—possibly distemper introduced by domestic dogs—also impacted the species. The prey base was reduced as native animals were also hunted. Finally, trapping by zoos seeking specimens contributed to the decline.

The decline: By the 1920s, thylacines were extremely rare. Occasional sightings and captures occurred, but the population was functionally extinct.

Benjamin: The last known thylacine, later named “Benjamin,” was captured in 1933 and sent to Hobart Zoo. Benjamin lived three years in captivity. On September 7, 1936—a cold night—zoo staff locked Benjamin out of its sheltered sleeping area. The animal died from exposure. The extinction was not a slow fading but a preventable death caused by human negligence.

Bitter irony: Just 59 days before Benjamin died, the thylacine had finally been given protected status. The protection came too late.

Post-Extinction Sightings

Almost immediately after Benjamin’s death, reports began of thylacines still alive in the wild:

1937 onward: Within a year of the official extinction, sightings were reported from remote Tasmanian wilderness. These reports have never stopped.

Volume of reports: Thousands of sightings have been recorded since 1936. The Tasmanian government has received hundreds of formal reports. Private databases contain thousands more. Sightings occur every year, sometimes dozens annually. Most come from remote areas of Tasmania, but some from mainland Australia.

Credible witnesses: Many reports come from people who should know what they saw. National park rangers, farmers who have lived on the land for generations, wildlife researchers, hunters familiar with Tasmanian fauna, and police officers and emergency responders have all contributed to the reports.

Consistency of descriptions: Despite coming from witnesses who often had no contact with each other, reports are remarkably consistent. They describe a striped, dog-like animal, a stiff tail, an unusual gait, and a quick tendency to flee into bush. The animals are most often seen at dawn or dusk, crossing roads.

Notable Sightings and Searches

Several incidents stand out:

1982 expedition: A Parks and Wildlife officer reported seeing a thylacine during an official expedition. The sighting was considered credible enough to warrant further investigation.

1985 patrol officer: A tracker following a different animal encountered what he identified as a thylacine. He was an experienced observer of Tasmanian wildlife.

1995 camera trap: An expedition deployed camera traps specifically to capture thylacine evidence. No confirmed thylacines were photographed, but several anomalous images sparked debate.

1997 road crossing: A family reported a clear daylight sighting of an animal crossing a road, describing the stripes and gait in detail. They were considered reliable witnesses.

2005 German tourist: A tourist photographed an animal he believed was a thylacine in Tasmania. The image was indistinct but generated significant interest.

2017 “credible” sightings: Several sightings reported to Tasmanian authorities were classified as “credible” by wildlife officials, prompting renewed interest.

Ongoing reports: Every year brings new sightings. The Thylacine Awareness Group and other organizations maintain databases of reports and continue investigation.

Serious efforts have been made to find surviving thylacines:

Government expeditions: The Tasmanian government has funded multiple search expeditions, particularly in the mid-20th century when extinction was more recent and survival was more plausible.

Private searches: Wealthy individuals and organizations have funded searches. Ted Turner offered a $100,000 reward for proof of a living thylacine. Various foundations have funded camera trap programs. Amateur enthusiasts regularly search remote areas.

Camera trap programs: Thousands of motion-activated cameras have been deployed throughout Tasmania’s wilderness. Despite capturing rare and elusive species, none have photographed a confirmed thylacine.

Expeditions to “sighting hotspots”: Areas with concentrated reports receive particular attention. The southwest Tasmania wilderness, the Western Tasmania World Heritage Area, remote road systems where crossing sightings occur, and specific properties with recurring reports are all targets.

Results: No search has produced definitive evidence—no clear photographs, no specimens, no confirmed tracks, no authenticated DNA from fresh samples.

The Evidence Question

The lack of hard evidence is the central challenge:

What exists: Thousands of eyewitness accounts (testimonial evidence), some photographs (all disputed or inconclusive), video footage (poor quality, unverified), reported tracks and scat (never authenticated), and possible audio recordings (unconfirmed).

What doesn’t exist: A verified photograph or video from the wild since 1936, physical remains (bones, carcass, roadkill), authenticated DNA from post-1936 material, and camera trap evidence despite thousands of deployed cameras.

The logical challenge: If thylacines survive, why hasn’t modern technology documented them? Possible answers include: the population is extremely small and dispersed, animals are nocturnal and extremely wary, habitat is vast and largely roadless, camera trap coverage is still limited, and thylacines might avoid areas where cameras are placed.

The skeptical view: Given the intensity of search efforts and the absence of physical evidence, most scientists conclude thylacines are extinct. The ongoing sightings are attributed to misidentification of dogs, foxes, or other animals.

De-Extinction: The Scientific Resurrection

If thylacines cannot be found, they might be created:

DNA extraction: Scientists have successfully extracted DNA from preserved thylacine specimens in museums—skins, pups preserved in alcohol, and other materials.

The thylacine genome: The complete thylacine genome has been sequenced. We know the genetic blueprint for the animal.

The Colossal/TIGRR initiative: The University of Melbourne and the biotechnology company Colossal Biosciences are working to resurrect the thylacine: The plan involves editing the genome of a related marsupial (the fat-tailed dunnart) to express thylacine characteristics. Gene editing technology (CRISPR) makes this theoretically possible. The resulting animal would be a hybrid, not a pure thylacine, but would possess many thylacine traits.

Challenges: The dunnart is tiny compared to a thylacine—massive genetic changes required. Carrying a thylacine embryo to term in a different species is challenging. Reintroducing the species to Tasmania raises ecological questions. Ethical concerns about “de-extinction” and resource allocation exist.

Timeline: Researchers have suggested a “living” thylacine might be possible within 10-20 years, though this is optimistic.

Tasmania’s Wilderness

The possibility of survival reflects Tasmania’s unique geography:

Vast wilderness: Tasmania’s southwest wilderness is one of the last true wildernesses in the temperate world: Approximately 6,000 square miles of protected wild land. Much of it is trackless and rarely visited by humans. Weather conditions make exploration difficult. Some areas have never been surveyed.

Wildlife surprises: Tasmania has produced zoological surprises: Species thought extinct have been rediscovered. New species continue to be documented. Rare animals survive undetected for decades.

The hope: Believers argue that if any large mammal could survive undetected, it would be in Tasmania—a place where wilderness still exists at a scale allowing genuinely hidden populations.

A Symbol of Loss

The thylacine has become more than a cryptid—it’s a symbol:

Conservation symbol: The thylacine represents human-caused extinction, a reminder of what happens when we exterminate species we consider inconvenient.

National Threatened Species Day: Australia marks September 7—the anniversary of Benjamin’s death—as a day to remember extinct species and protect threatened ones.

Cultural significance: The thylacine appears on Tasmanian coats of arms, beer labels, sports team logos, and countless artistic representations. It haunts the Tasmanian imagination.

The ghost: Whether alive in the bush or resurrected in a laboratory, the thylacine refuses to be forgotten. It has become a ghost that a nation refuses to let go.

The Watch Continues

Somewhere tonight, on a remote Tasmanian road, someone might glance into their headlights and see something—a dog-like shape with stripes on its back, a stiff tail, an odd gait. They’ll watch it disappear into the bush and wonder.

Was it a thylacine? Probably not. Almost certainly not. Every scientific assessment suggests the species is gone.

But “almost certainly” is not “absolutely.” Tasmania keeps its secrets well, and the wilderness is vast, and people keep seeing things. The last official thylacine died on a cold September night in 1936, locked out of its shelter by careless keepers. It died because of us.

Perhaps that’s why we can’t quite accept it’s gone. Perhaps that’s why we keep searching, keep reporting, keep hoping. The thylacine’s extinction wasn’t natural—it was our fault. And somewhere in the human heart, there’s a hope that this particular mistake might still be undone.

The cameras are waiting in the bush. The reports keep coming in. And in laboratories, scientists are working to bring back what we destroyed.

The Tasmanian Tiger isn’t quite gone—not yet. Not as long as someone is still looking.

Sources