Case File · Department of War · Post-Cold War (1990-2016) Declassified October 23, 2026 · PURSUE Release 07

BAASS Self-Assessment of UAP Analysis Capabilities, November 2010 — Department of War File

UFO Government Report

This November 2010 Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies (BAASS) contractor-authored capability statement presents BAASS’s analysis as technically rigorous and strategically valuable. The document appears intended not only to describe BAASS’s analytical capabilities but also to reinforce the…

November 23, 2010
Las Vegas, Nevada
Multiple colros in a black box on a white page.
Multiple colros in a black box on a white page. · Source: declassified document

Incident Overview

This report was produced by Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies (BAASS), the Las Vegas contractor that ran the Defense Intelligence Agency’s Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP), and is dated November 23, 2010. It was declassified and published on October 23, 2026 as part of the seventh tranche of the Department of War’s Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters (PURSUE). The released copy carries redactions.

What the government released

This document is an administrative, programmatic, or contractor-produced record related to the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP), a Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)-administered program active from 2008 to 2012. AAWSAP’s official scope of work identified 12 technical research areas relating to potential aerospace threats over a time horizon of more than 40 years. As part of the broader program record, the file documents how AAWSAP was scoped, organized, tasked, funded, executed, or described at a particular point in time.

This November 2010 Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies (BAASS) contractor-authored capability statement presents BAASS’s analysis as technically rigorous and strategically valuable. The document appears intended not only to describe BAASS’s analytical capabilities but also to reinforce the case for the organization’s continued relevance and for the continuation of AAWSAP. The document summarizes the company’s self-assessment of the suitability of its personnel, software, equipment, field sensor, and data warehousing capabilities for analyzing unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and unidentified submerged objects (USOs). It includes excerpted case findings and uses selected case studies and modeling exercises as demonstrations of BAASS’s analytical capabilities. The report describes BAASS as combining field collection resources, historical databases, and computational tools such as ANSYS Multiphysics to model UAP incidents through engineering and physics analysis, including work on radar cross section, fluid behavior, acoustics, and aerodynamic performance. It also presents BAASS’s in-house capabilities as supporting both threat assessment and the study of advanced aerospace technologies, while asserting that analysis of UAP performance characteristics could inform future developments in propulsion, stealth, detection, and weapons systems.

The case in this archive

This record is a primary source for the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program, written up here at length from the contemporary record. The file and the case history are worth reading against each other: the document is narrower and more cautious than the account that grew up around it, which is usually the point.

Status of the case

This is a contractor’s report to the government, written by a firm that was paid to study the subject and had its own reasons to show that the work was worth continuing. Its statements are the contractor’s claims, not Defense Intelligence Agency findings, and the Department of War’s release carries no endorsement of them. Where the report relays witness accounts, many of them taken from the Mutual UFO Network’s case files, those accounts were not independently checked in any way the pages show. Its value is as a record of what the program actually did month to month, which is the question public argument about AAWSAP has most lacked documents to answer. The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office has made no determination about this record.

Sources