Florida's 2025 Cryptid Wave: Skunk Apes, Frogmen, and Coastal Anomalies

Cryptid

Across the summer of 2025, Florida produced an unusual concentration of cryptid reports — Skunk Ape encounters in the Big Cypress, Loveland Frog–type sightings on the I-4 corridor, and coastal humanoid reports along the Gulf — drawing renewed attention from researchers.

Summer 2025
Florida, USA
47+ witnesses
Bright object hovering above a Florida wetland landscape at dusk
Bright object hovering above a Florida wetland landscape at dusk · Artistic depiction; AI-generated imagery, not a photograph of the event

The summer of 2025 produced what researchers in the field of cryptozoology came to call, with characteristic understatement, “an interesting Florida season.” Across a four-month period running from May into September, the state generated an unusual concentration of cryptid reports — reports of Skunk Ape encounters across the Big Cypress and Everglades regions, of small bipedal frog-like figures along the I-4 corridor that drew comparison with the long-disputed Loveland Frogman tradition of southern Ohio, and of unidentified humanoid figures observed near the Gulf coast under circumstances that defied easy categorization. The reports varied widely in their evidentiary quality, but their concentration across a single state and a single season drew attention from researchers, podcasters, and a small number of journalists, and they have since been grouped in the cryptozoological literature as the “Florida Wave” of 2025.

The Skunk Ape Reports

The summer’s most numerous category of reports concerned the Skunk Ape, the regional Florida counterpart to the broader Bigfoot tradition. Reports of Skunk Ape encounters are a more or less continuous feature of the Florida cryptozoological landscape, with the Big Cypress and Everglades regions generating sightings on a regular if not predictable basis. What distinguished the 2025 season was the concentration of reports — approximately twenty-three documented accounts over the four-month window — and the unusual proportion of those reports that came from witnesses who had not previously expressed interest in or familiarity with the Skunk Ape tradition.

Several of the most discussed cases came from Big Cypress National Preserve and the surrounding tracts of public and private land. A pair of hunters from Lee County reported a brief but vivid encounter on the morning of June 18, in which a large hair-covered figure had crossed a fire road approximately fifty yards ahead of their vehicle and disappeared into a stand of cypress before they could photograph it. A family of campers near Ochopee reported foul odors and unusual vocalizations during a two-night stay in late July, with one family member reporting a brief visual sighting of “something tall and dark” near their site at dusk. A small group of researchers from a Tampa-based BFRO chapter conducted follow-up investigations at several of the reported encounter sites and produced casts of footprints that they considered consistent with those documented in the broader Skunk Ape literature.

The veteran Skunk Ape researcher Dave Shealy, who operates the Skunk Ape Research Headquarters in Ochopee, characterized the 2025 season as among the most active he had documented in the preceding decade. Shealy was, as always, careful to distinguish between reports he considered evidentially robust and those that did not meet his investigative threshold; the figure of twenty-three documented accounts represented his preferred standard of evidence rather than the higher tally of total reports received.

The I-4 Frog-Like Figures

A second cluster of reports — smaller in number but striking in their internal consistency — concerned a series of encounters along and near the Interstate 4 corridor that runs across central Florida from Tampa through Orlando to Daytona Beach. Between June and August of 2025, approximately seven witnesses reported brief encounters with small bipedal figures of approximately three to four feet in height, with smooth or moist-appearing skin and large luminous eyes, observed at night near drainage ditches, retention ponds, and small bodies of water adjacent to the highway. The witnesses described the figures as standing upright, moving rapidly when startled, and producing a brief, unmistakable visual impression that was consistently characterized as “frog-like” or “lizard-like.”

The reports drew immediate comparison with the Loveland Frogman tradition of southern Ohio, in which similar bipedal amphibian-like figures were reported in the 1970s and have been the subject of intermittent reports since. The Florida cluster was the first concentrated wave of Loveland-comparable reports outside the original Ohio region, and it generated substantial attention in the cryptozoological podcasts and newsletters that have, in recent years, become the primary venue for such discussions.

Investigators noted that the reports came from witnesses who, in most cases, had no prior familiarity with the Loveland tradition and could not have been expected to be primed for the specific phenomenology. The witnesses were also, in most cases, willing to be interviewed in detail and to provide information about the encounter sites, the lighting conditions, and the contemporaneous circumstances. The cluster has since been the subject of an ongoing investigation by a coalition of researchers, with results expected to be published in the cryptozoological literature in 2026.

Coastal Humanoid Reports

The summer’s third category of reports — the most evidentially difficult of the three — concerned a small number of accounts from witnesses along the Gulf coast describing humanoid figures observed near the waterline at night. The reports came primarily from beaches in Pinellas, Manatee, and Sarasota counties, and described figures of approximately human size and proportion, observed standing in the surf or walking along the wet sand at dusk or in the early hours of the morning, that produced in witnesses an immediate impression of strangeness — of being not quite human, of moving in an unusual manner, or of disappearing into the water in a way that conventional swimmers would not.

The coastal reports were the most difficult of the wave to evaluate. Witnesses were typically alone or in small groups, the encounters were brief, and the lighting conditions made detailed observation difficult. Researchers noted the persistent if marginal tradition of “merfolk” or amphibian-humanoid reports along the Gulf coast, dating back to the early twentieth century and recurring in scattered accounts since. The 2025 cluster did not produce evidence sufficient to substantiate the existence of any such category of creature, but it did add to a documentary record that researchers in the broader Florida cryptid tradition have been compiling for decades.

A Season of Strange Florida

The 2025 Florida wave joins a long regional tradition of unusual reports from a state whose geography, climate, and cultural history have always been hospitable to the strange. Florida’s combination of vast wetlands, dense forests, extensive coastline, and substantial human population in close proximity to all of these has produced, over the decades, a steady stream of reports that have ranged from the well-documented to the wildly speculative. The 2025 wave was notable not for any single dramatic incident but for the breadth of its reports across multiple cryptid categories and across the geographic span of the state.

For the cryptozoological community, the Florida wave was a reminder that the kind of regional reporting waves that produced foundational cases like the original Patterson-Gimlin encounter at Bluff Creek or the Mothman flap of 1966-1967 at Point Pleasant continue to occur in the present day. Whether the Florida reports will ultimately enter the canonical cryptozoological literature or fade into the broader background of regional folklore is a question that will only be answered by the patient work of investigators in the seasons ahead.

Sources