Rendlesham Binary Code
Sergeant Jim Penniston claims to have received a telepathic binary code download while touching a landed UFO in Rendlesham Forest. Decoded, it allegedly contains coordinates to ancient sites.
The Rendlesham Binary Code
In a controversial addendum to the Rendlesham Forest incident, Sergeant Jim Penniston revealed in 2010 that he had received a telepathic “download” of binary code while touching the landed craft on December 26, 1980. He claims to have written the code in his notebook while in a trance-like state.
Background
The Rendlesham Forest incident of December 1980 involved multiple US Air Force personnel encountering an unidentified craft over two nights near RAF Bentwaters/Woodbridge in Suffolk, England.
Penniston’s Claim
According to Penniston’s later accounts:
- When he touched the craft’s surface, he felt a “download”
- He entered a trance-like state
- He filled 16 pages of his notebook with binary code
- He didn’t understand the compulsion to write
- He didn’t examine the notes for years afterward
The Binary Code
The code, when converted to ASCII text, allegedly produces:
- A message reading “Exploration of Humanity”
- Geographic coordinates
- Reference points spanning millennia
- Locations including the Great Pyramid, Nazca Lines, and other ancient sites
The Coordinates
The decoded locations allegedly include:
- Great Pyramid of Giza
- Nazca Lines, Peru
- Sedona, Arizona
- Bimini Road, Bahamas
- Hy-Brasil (legendary island)
- Various other significant sites
Controversies
The binary code claim is highly controversial:
- It was revealed decades after the original incident
- It wasn’t mentioned in Penniston’s original statements
- The decoding has been questioned technically
- Some coordinates don’t lead to significant locations
Supporters’ View
Those who find the claim credible note:
- Penniston’s otherwise consistent testimony
- The specificity of the binary data
- Connections to other ancient mystery sites
- The “download” experience reported in other cases
Critics’ View
Skeptics point out:
- The 30-year delay in revealing the code
- Technical issues with the binary/ASCII conversion
- Penniston’s changing story over time
- No contemporary documentation of the code
Investigation
Researchers have examined the binary code:
- Multiple decoding attempts
- Geographic verification of coordinates
- Analysis of the notebook pages
- Comparison with original 1980 statements
Relation to Main Incident
The binary code represents an addition to the well-documented core incident:
- The original Rendlesham case has strong evidence
- Multiple witnesses confirmed strange lights and craft
- The binary code is Penniston’s alone
- It neither proves nor disproves the original event
Significance
The binary code claim raises questions about:
- Witness memory and later revelations
- The nature of contact experiences
- How to evaluate claims added years later
- The relationship between UFOs and ancient sites
Legacy
Whether authentic or fabricated, the Rendlesham binary code has become part of UFO lore:
- Featured in documentaries and books
- Debated extensively in UFO communities
- Illustrates the complexity of historical cases
- Shows how cases can evolve over time
The code remains one of the most controversial elements of an otherwise well-documented case.