Back to Events
UFO

Rendlesham Binary Code

Sergeant Jim Penniston claims to have received a telepathic binary code download while touching a landed UFO in Rendlesham Forest. Decoded, it allegedly contains coordinates to ancient sites.

December 27, 1980
Rendlesham Forest, Suffolk, England
1+ witnesses

The Rendlesham Binary Code

In a controversial addendum to the Rendlesham Forest incident, Sergeant Jim Penniston revealed in 2010 that he had received a telepathic “download” of binary code while touching the landed craft on December 26, 1980. He claims to have written the code in his notebook while in a trance-like state.

Background

The Rendlesham Forest incident of December 1980 involved multiple US Air Force personnel encountering an unidentified craft over two nights near RAF Bentwaters/Woodbridge in Suffolk, England.

Penniston’s Claim

According to Penniston’s later accounts:

  • When he touched the craft’s surface, he felt a “download”
  • He entered a trance-like state
  • He filled 16 pages of his notebook with binary code
  • He didn’t understand the compulsion to write
  • He didn’t examine the notes for years afterward

The Binary Code

The code, when converted to ASCII text, allegedly produces:

  • A message reading “Exploration of Humanity”
  • Geographic coordinates
  • Reference points spanning millennia
  • Locations including the Great Pyramid, Nazca Lines, and other ancient sites

The Coordinates

The decoded locations allegedly include:

  • Great Pyramid of Giza
  • Nazca Lines, Peru
  • Sedona, Arizona
  • Bimini Road, Bahamas
  • Hy-Brasil (legendary island)
  • Various other significant sites

Controversies

The binary code claim is highly controversial:

  • It was revealed decades after the original incident
  • It wasn’t mentioned in Penniston’s original statements
  • The decoding has been questioned technically
  • Some coordinates don’t lead to significant locations

Supporters’ View

Those who find the claim credible note:

  • Penniston’s otherwise consistent testimony
  • The specificity of the binary data
  • Connections to other ancient mystery sites
  • The “download” experience reported in other cases

Critics’ View

Skeptics point out:

  • The 30-year delay in revealing the code
  • Technical issues with the binary/ASCII conversion
  • Penniston’s changing story over time
  • No contemporary documentation of the code

Investigation

Researchers have examined the binary code:

  • Multiple decoding attempts
  • Geographic verification of coordinates
  • Analysis of the notebook pages
  • Comparison with original 1980 statements

Relation to Main Incident

The binary code represents an addition to the well-documented core incident:

  • The original Rendlesham case has strong evidence
  • Multiple witnesses confirmed strange lights and craft
  • The binary code is Penniston’s alone
  • It neither proves nor disproves the original event

Significance

The binary code claim raises questions about:

  • Witness memory and later revelations
  • The nature of contact experiences
  • How to evaluate claims added years later
  • The relationship between UFOs and ancient sites

Legacy

Whether authentic or fabricated, the Rendlesham binary code has become part of UFO lore:

  • Featured in documentaries and books
  • Debated extensively in UFO communities
  • Illustrates the complexity of historical cases
  • Shows how cases can evolve over time

The code remains one of the most controversial elements of an otherwise well-documented case.